Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:18:11 -0800 | From | "Michael K. Edwards" <> | Subject | Re: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers |
| |
On 2/19/07, Trent Waddington <trent.waddington@gmail.com> wrote: > Of course, now you're going to argue that there's no such thing as an > "incompatible license" or "mere aggregation" and that these are just > words that were made up for the GPL, so they can be ignored.. another > pointless semantic argument because it doesn't change the very simple > fact that you don't have any rights to copy the work unless you have a > license and you don't have a license if you fail to abide the > conditions of the license.
I don't have to argue these points, because they're obvious to anyone who cares to do their own homework. Appellate court decisions _are_ the law, my friend; read 'em and weep.
Cheers, - Michael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |