Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Re: NAK new drivers without proper power management? | From | Nigel Cunningham <> | Date | Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:06:06 +1100 |
| |
Hi.
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 19:53 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Having drivers explicitly marked as to whether they are safe is a good kernel > > feature; what to do if they're not is policy. > > That's true, but I assume that the people who opt for doing that are also > willing to take part in the review of the drivers. :-)
Absolutely :)
> Well, I don't think so. Let's estimate the number of drivers that define > .resume() right now: > > $ grep -I -l -r '.resume =' linux-2.6.20/drivers/ | wc > 102 102 4169
I think the '.resume =' doesn't help - some have tabs. I ran '\.resume' and got 351.
It would be interesting to see how many struct pci_driver etc instances lack resume methods.
Regards,
Nige
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |