lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] ext2: xip check fix
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Am I missing something here? I wonder how s390 works without this change?
>
> --
> ext2 should not worry about checking sb->s_blocksize for XIP before the
> sb's blocksize actually gets set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/ext2/super.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ext2/super.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/ext2/super.c
> @@ -844,8 +844,7 @@ static int ext2_fill_super(struct super_
>
> blocksize = BLOCK_SIZE << le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_log_block_size);
>
> - if ((ext2_use_xip(sb)) && ((blocksize != PAGE_SIZE) ||
> - (sb->s_blocksize != blocksize))) {
> + if (ext2_use_xip(sb) && blocksize != PAGE_SIZE) {
> if (!silent)
> printk("XIP: Unsupported blocksize\n");
> goto failed_mount;
"blocksize" contains the blocksize of the device here, and
sb->s_blocksize does contain the filesystem block size as saved in the
super block. Xip does only work, if both do match PAGE_SIZE because it
does'nt support multiple calls to direct_access in the get_xip_page
address space operation. Thus we check both here, actually this was
changed from how it looks after your patch as a bugfix where our
tester tried a 4k filesystem on a 2k blockdev.
Did I miss something?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-05 16:45    [W:0.137 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site