Messages in this thread | | | From | Hans-Peter Jansen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/11] writeback bug fixes and simplifications | Date | Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:56:59 +0100 |
| |
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 schrieb Sascha Warner: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <prx@cinatas.ath.cx> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one > >> pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some > >> rare pauses from its 100% usage, however. > >> > >> On ~23 minutes uptime i have ~19 minutes pdflush runtime. > >> > >> This is on E6600, x86_64, 2 Gig RAM, SATA HDD, running on gentoo > >> ~x64_64 > >> > >> Let me know if you need more info. > > > > (some) cc's restored. Please, always do reply-to-all. > > Hi Wu,
Sascha, if you want to address Fengguang by his first name, note that chinese and bavarians (and some others I forgot now, too) typically use the order:
lastname firstname
when they spell their names. Another evidence is, that the name Wu is a pretty common chinese family name.
Fengguang, if it's the other way around, correct me please (and I'm going to wear a big brown paper bag for the rest of the day..).
> Your latest patch does fix the seen pdflush 100% issue :) > > P.S.: Andrew, sorry my subject pretended I was subscribed to lkml, I am > not. I hoped for the script at lkml to pull the threads together because > of the subject.
Such a script _cannot_ exist for a mailing list. Sane mailing list software mangles messages in the least intrusive way and highly depend on users doing the right thing. In this case, that's what Sam suggested below!
A-happy-new-year-for-all-kernel-hacking-heros-ly-yrs,
Pete
| |