Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:13:37 +0100 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] block: non-atomic queue_flags prep |
| |
On Tue, Dec 18 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:44:40AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 15 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is just an idea I had, which might make request processing a little > > > bit cheaper depending on queue behaviour. For example if it is getting plugged > > > unplugged frequently (as I think is the case for some database workloads), > > > then we might save one or two atomic operations per request. > > > > > > Anyway, I'm not completely sure if I have ensured all queue_flags users are > > > safe (I think md may need a bit of help). But overall it seems quite doable. > > > > Looks ok to me, I'll throw it into the testing mix. Thanks Nick! > > OK... actually if you are expecting it to be widely tested, can you change > the BUG_ONs in queue_flag_set / queue_flag_clear into WARN_ON? > > That way it's less likely to take down people's systems...
Agree, will do so.
-- Jens Axboe
| |