Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:31:07 -0500 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [patch 02/20] make the inode i_mmap_lock a reader/writer lock |
| |
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:52:09 -0500 Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:
> I keep these patches up to date for testing. I don't have conclusive > evidence whether they alleviate or exacerbate the problem nor by how > much.
When the queued locking from Ingo's x86 tree hits mainline, I suspect that spinlocks may end up behaving a lot nicer.
Should I drop the rwlock patches from my tree for now and focus on just the page reclaim stuff?
-- All Rights Reversed
| |