Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:53:53 +0100 | From | Guillaume Chazarain <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 |
| |
Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it> wrote:
> Sorry for disappearing. Anyway, yes, those patches fixed it. Precision in > delays isn't that good when using my crappy unstable TSC (mdelay(2000) > causes delays between 2 and 2.9 seconds) but it's not depending on frequency > changes anymore. So I'd say it's fixed, but please tell me if you want me > to do any other test so as to be sure it is.
Ingo,
it seems you dropped http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/100 (cpu_clock() based udelay), so how udelay can be affected by your proposed changes?
Thanks.
-- Guillaume
| |