lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
    Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it> wrote:

    > Sorry for disappearing. Anyway, yes, those patches fixed it. Precision in
    > delays isn't that good when using my crappy unstable TSC (mdelay(2000)
    > causes delays between 2 and 2.9 seconds) but it's not depending on frequency
    > changes anymore. So I'd say it's fixed, but please tell me if you want me
    > to do any other test so as to be sure it is.

    Ingo,

    it seems you dropped http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/100 (cpu_clock()
    based udelay), so how udelay can be affected by your proposed changes?

    Thanks.

    --
    Guillaume


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-12-11 01:03    [W:2.164 / U:0.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site