lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: is minimum udelay() not respected in preemptible SMP kernel-2.6.23?
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:20:58AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > But I think we'd be best off stashing a single bit somewhere and
> > checking it at migrate time (relatively infrequent) rather than
> > copying and zeroing out a potentially enormous affinity mask every
> > time we disable migration (often, and in fast paths). Perhaps adding
> > TASK_PINNED to the task state flags would do it?
>
> It would need to be a count to be able to nest it.

Ahh, right. Suppose that means fattening the task struct until someone
comes up with something more clever.

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-08 03:51    [W:0.403 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site