Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Defense in depth: LSM *modules*, not a static interface | From | Tetsuo Handa <> | Date | Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:11:39 +0900 |
| |
Hello.
Casey Schaufler wrote: > Fine grained capabilities are a bonus, and there are lots of > people who think that it would be really nifty if there were a > separate capability for each "if" in the kernel. I personally > don't see need for more than about 20. That is a matter of taste. > DG/UX ended up with 330 and I say that's too many.
TOMOYO Linux has own (non-POSIX) capability that can support 65536 capabilities if there *were* a separate capability for each "if" in the kernel. http://svn.sourceforge.jp/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/2.1.x/tomoyo-lsm/patches/tomoyo-capability.diff?root=tomoyo&view=markup
The reason I don't use POSIX capability is that the maximum types are limited to bitwidth of a variable (i.e. currently 32, or are we going to extend it to 64). This leads to abuse of CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability. In other words, it makes fine-grained privilege division impossible.
Since security_capable() cannot receive fine-grained values, TOMOYO can't do fine-grained privilege division.
I wish if capability machanism has mapping layer like:
#define CAP_DIVIDED_FOO1 0 #define CAP_DIVIDED_FOO2 1 #define CAP_DIVIDED_FOO3 2 ... #define CAP_DIVIDED_BAR1 100 #define CAP_DIVIDED_BAR2 101 #define CAP_DIVIDED_BAR3 102
const int cap_divided_to_grouped(int cap_divided) { static const int cap_mapping_array[] = { /* [divided index value] = POSIX compatible index value (i.e. 0-31) */ [CAP_DIVIDED_FOO1] = 0, [CAP_DIVIDED_FOO2] = 0, [CAP_DIVIDED_FOO3] = 0, [CAP_DIVIDED_BAR1] = 1, [CAP_DIVIDED_BAR2] = 1, [CAP_DIVIDED_BAR3] = 1, }; return cap_mapping_array[cap_divided]; }
int capable(int cap_divided) { return security_capable(cap_divided); }
int security_capable(int cap_divided) { /* Allow LSM to decide based on fine-grained capability index. */ return LSM_implementation_specific_capability_check(cap_divided_to_grouped(cap_divided)); }
int function_foo(void) { if (!capable(CAP_DIVIDED_FOO1)) return -EPERM; return 0; }
int function_bar(void) { if (!capable(CAP_DIVIDED_BAR2)) return -EPERM; return 0; }
Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |