lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c
    Adrian Bunk wrote:
    >
    > I have read the hep text, but are the advantages of HZ == 300 really
    > visible or was this more theoretical?
    >
    > In the latter case, we might remove the HZ == 300 choice instead.
    >

    Well, we have, for various architectures:

    HZ == 48, 100, 128, 250, 256, 300, 1000, 1024

    You'd have to kill 48, 128, 256, 300 and 1024.

    -hpa

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-12-01 05:43    [W:8.660 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site