Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:39:20 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [bug] SLOB, tipc_init(), WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52 kmap_atomic_prot() |
| |
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> i'm getting this on 32-bit (with the kmap-atomic debugging patch > applied): > > ----------------> > Calling initcall 0x78b67c00: tipc_init+0x0/0xc0() > TIPC: Activated (version 1.6.2 compiled Nov 29 2007 15:04:36) > WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52 kmap_atomic_prot() > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc3-cfs-v24 #45 > [<78107272>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x40 > [<781072ad>] show_trace+0xd/0x20 > [<781086f8>] dump_stack+0x58/0x60 > [<7811541f>] kmap_atomic_prot+0x1bf/0x240 > [<781154ae>] kmap_atomic+0xe/0x20 > [<78157be5>] get_page_from_freelist+0x225/0x420 > [<78157e4d>] __alloc_pages+0x6d/0x3a0 > [<78169a7b>] slob_new_page+0x1b/0x60 > [<78169be4>] slob_alloc+0x124/0x1e0 > [<78169e0f>] __kmalloc_node+0x6f/0xa0 > [<7884f7c2>] reg_init+0x42/0x80 > [<7884f80a>] tipc_reg_start+0xa/0x40 > [<7883e6c6>] tipc_core_start+0x66/0xc0 > [<78b67c81>] tipc_init+0x81/0xc0
this is due to the kzalloc() here:
0x7884f1d0 is in reg_init (net/tipc/user_reg.c:88). 83 spin_lock_bh(®_lock); 84 if (!users) { 85 users = kzalloc(USER_LIST_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC); 86 if (users) { 87 for (i = 1; i <= MAX_USERID; i++) { 88 users[i].next = i - 1;
which does a:
120 static inline void clear_highpage(struct page *page) 121 { 122 void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0); 123 clear_page(kaddr); 124 kunmap_atomic(kaddr, KM_USER0); 125 }
but ... why does the debug code think it's in softirq context?
plus, and this is a slob question i guess, how come we drop into clear_highpage() for a kzalloc()??
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |