Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:18:34 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [3/10] per-zone active inactive counter |
| |
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:24:06 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:37:02 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > Maybe zonelists of NODE_DATA() is not initialized. you are right. > > I think N_HIGH_MEMORY will be suitable here...(I'll consider node-hotplug case later.) > > > > Thank you for test! > > > Could you try this ? > Sorry..this can be a workaround but I noticed I miss something..
ok, just use N_HIGH_MEMORY here and add comment for hotplugging support is not yet.
Christoph-san, Lee-san, could you confirm following ?
- when SLAB is used, kmalloc_node() against offline node will success. - when SLUB is used, kmalloc_node() against offline node will panic.
Then, the caller should take care that node is online before kmalloc().
Regards, -Kame
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |