Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:22:45 +0100 | From | Haavard Skinnemoen <> | Subject | Re: git guidance |
| |
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:20:46 +0100 (CET) Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote:
> On Nov 27 2007 23:33, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > > > >It didn't work too well. The first result was one of maximal > >embarrassment: I produced a patch that didn't even compile when > >applied to the official tree. This shouldn't happen with git, right? > >Well, it did. So now I'm back to keeping a virgin kernel source tree > >alongside my development area in order to produce diffs. That can't > >be right? > > > No, it can't. Use stgit/quilt ;p
No, use "git rebase --interactive" ;-)
I've tried stgit/guilt/quilt as well, but I could never quite get the hang of it (adding the files _before_ editing is the difficult part.) On the other hand, git rebase --interactive fit right into my workflow and improved it massively.
But I guess it's all a matter of personal preference.
Haavard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |