Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:46:49 +0300 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] fix setsid() for sub-namespace /sbin/init |
| |
On 11/26, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes: > > > This is different, perhaps we can keep this call. kernel_thread(kernel_init) > > attaches /sbin/init to init_struct_pid. Nothing bad, and a "good" init should > > do setsid() anyway. But who knows? Some special environment may expect that > > getpgrp() != 0. Not that I really disagree on this issue though. > > init starting with session == pgrp == 0 is historical linux behavior. I consider > the current 2.6 behavior a temporary aberation from the historical linux behavior.
Ah, OK.
> Plus once we do this the code will be easier to maintain because we have > removed one obscure special case.
Yes indeed. So we can remove this special case code as soon as copy_process() is changed.
Oleg.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |