lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: is it useful testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED in dev_close()?
From
From: <wyb@topsec.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:26:26 +0800

> cpu0 calling netif_rx_schedule_prep(), cpu1 calling dev_close():
>
> cpu0: testing __LINK_STATE_START, already set
> cpu1: clear__LINK_STATE_START
> cpu1: testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, not set
> cpu0: set __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED
> cpu0: enter net poll, ...
>
> when cpu1 return from dev_close(),__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED is still set.

You'll have better luck asking networking questions on
netdev@vger.kernel.org as that is the mailing list where
the kernel networking developers are subscribed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-20 11:45    [W:0.028 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site