Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:42:27 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: is it useful testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED in dev_close()? | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: <wyb@topsec.com.cn> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:26:26 +0800
> cpu0 calling netif_rx_schedule_prep(), cpu1 calling dev_close(): > > cpu0: testing __LINK_STATE_START, already set > cpu1: clear__LINK_STATE_START > cpu1: testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, not set > cpu0: set __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED > cpu0: enter net poll, ... > > when cpu1 return from dev_close(),__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED is still set.
You'll have better luck asking networking questions on netdev@vger.kernel.org as that is the mailing list where the kernel networking developers are subscribed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |