Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:30:27 -0500 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: [stable] Soft lockups since stable kernel upgrade to 2.6.23.8 |
| |
On 11/17/2007 07:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > >> Great, thanks for tracking this down. >> >> Ingo, this corrisponds to changeset >> a115d5caca1a2905ba7a32b408a6042b20179aaa in mainline. Is that patch >> incorrect? Should this patch in the -stable tree be reverted? > > hm, there are no such problems in .24 and the cpu_clock() and other > fixes i did were not picked up. Find the missing fixes below. They > should work just fine in .23 as it has the cpu_clock() functionality > too. > > [ NOTE: the most robust thing is to make the .23 version match the .24 > version of kernel/softlockup.c, so i included two other harmless > changes in this diff as well. ] > > Ingo > > -----------> > commit a5f2ce3c6024a5bb895647b6bd88ecae5001020a > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > Date: Tue Oct 16 23:26:08 2007 -0700 > > commit 43581a10075492445f65234384210492ff333eba > Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > Date: Tue Oct 16 23:26:08 2007 -0700
Those are just cosmetic / cleanup changes.
Don't you need commit a3b13c23f186ecb57204580cc1f2dbe9c284953a ?? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |