lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework
    On Nov 14, 2007 11:30 AM, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
    > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, eric miao wrote:
    > > > > Can we use "per gpio based" structure instead of "per gpio_chip" based one,
    > > > > just like what the generic IRQ layer is doing nowadays?
    > > >
    > > > We "can" do most anything. What would that improve though?
    >
    > ... What would that improve, though? Your followup posts
    > still don't answer that question for me. I see the code,
    > but don't have an answer to that question.
    >

    to be honest, I don't feel like the holes. Put restrictions on the numbering
    of GPIOs might not be a good idea either.

    >
    >
    >



    --
    Cheers
    - eric
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-11-14 07:43    [W:6.863 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site