Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:40:53 +0800 | From | "eric miao" <> | Subject | Re: [patch/rfc 1/4] GPIO implementation framework |
| |
On Nov 14, 2007 11:30 AM, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, eric miao wrote: > > > > Can we use "per gpio based" structure instead of "per gpio_chip" based one, > > > > just like what the generic IRQ layer is doing nowadays? > > > > > > We "can" do most anything. What would that improve though? > > ... What would that improve, though? Your followup posts > still don't answer that question for me. I see the code, > but don't have an answer to that question. >
to be honest, I don't feel like the holes. Put restrictions on the numbering of GPIOs might not be a good idea either.
> > >
-- Cheers - eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |