Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:08:47 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| |
* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
> > (and this is in no way directed at the networking folks - it holds > > for all of us. I have one main complaint about networking: the > > separate netdev list is a bad idea - networking regressions should > > be discussed and fixed on lkml, like most other subsystems are. Any > > artificial split of the lk discussion space is bad.) > > but here I disagree. LKML is already too busy and noisy. Major > subsystems need their own discussion areas.
That's a stupid argument. We lose much more by forced isolation of discussion than what we win by having less traffic! It's _MUCH_ easier to narrow down information (by filter by threads, by topics, by people, etc.) than it is to gobble information together from various fractured sources. We learned it _again and again_ that isolation of kernel discussions causes bad things.
In fact this thread is the very example: David points out that on netdev some of those bugs were already discussed and resolved. Had it been all on lkml we'd all be aware of it.
this is a single kernel project that is released together as one codebase, so a central place of discussion is obvious and common-sense.
so please stop this "too busy and too noisy" nonsense already. It was nonsense 10 years ago and it's nonsense today. In 10 years the kernel grew from a 1 million lines codebase to an 8 million lines codebase, so what? Deal with it and be intelligent about filtering your information influx instead of imposing a hard pre-filtering criteria that restricts intelligent processing of information.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |