Messages in this thread | | | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench | Date | Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:41:58 +1100 |
| |
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 06:44, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > BTW. your size-2048 kmalloc cache is order-1 in the default setup, > > wheras kmalloc(1024) or kmalloc(4096) will be order-0 allocations. And > > SLAB also uses order-0 for size-2048. It would be nice if SLUB did the > > same... > > You can try to see the effect that order 0 would have by booting with > > slub_max_order=0
Yeah, that didn't help much, but in general I think it would give more consistent and reliable behaviour from slub. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |