lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> With this set we'll be able to mark pid namespaces as EXPERIMENTAL
>> or even BROKEN, so nobody will be able to crate them. So can we, please,
>> keep things as they are for now - the appropriate fix will be ready
>> soon.
>
> You sound far too optimistic for my taste. I probably haven't seen the
> proposal you have in mind but everything else I have seen simply doesn't
> work without breaking something.

The "fix" I mention is just returning -EINVAL in case user orders
CLONE_NEWPIDS and compiling out all the namespace cloning code. This
is just a more elegant way to get rid of pid namespaces rather than
Ingo proposed.

Here's the root of the set:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/31/118

Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-01 16:09    [W:0.059 / U:1.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site