Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Oct 2007 00:18:29 +0200 | Subject | Re: syntax highlighting, emacs ([PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)) | From | Oleg Verych <> |
| |
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:43:46PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Oct 7 2007 22:50, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > >In fact mc config (ini) section is a better way. > > Yes, for the default colors. But /usr/share/mc/syntax/ specifies > more of them.
Syntax highlighting, OK.
Kind of funny thing with it. One for shell in `mcedit` is much nicer, but `emacs` is more powerful as editor(R). But both have highlighting problems with non trivial scripts (quoiting, data here, etc). I don't know if it will ever be fixed :).
Comprehensive highlighting of contents of diffs (or even _patched_ sources) is XXII century feature.
Anyway if anybody have anything to look onto, like more Linux C types, bogus coding style highlighting, i'll be glad to test. And any emacs hacks, that gurus are using will be very appreciated.
[0] emacs setup and fontlocking <ftp://flower.upol.cz/emacs/>
> >I use default blue (which is very annoying) > > If blue were annoying, it would not be the default Windows background > (since Windows 2000). Then again, it's personal preference,
Emacs have black background by default. I changed foreground to green, and it is much nicer for long runs. Blue (or any bright) background isn't comfortable, i think.
> so I suppose you have a red/green desktop wallpaper for X11?
Black background mostly. If you know classic blackbox wm (version <= 0.62), then Rancor(80%) and Artwiz(20%) my all time styles. But i use no X for quite some time now. ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |