lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
Hi -

On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:17:22PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> [...]
> Since gcc is required to build the systemtap probes on the development
> marchine, I don't see why it would be much harder to also require prople
> to install drawf ? Or maybe the "crash" tool ?

The crash tool requires the dwarf data to work. The dwarf data for an
entire kernel (including all the modules) is on the order of hundreds
of megabytes. The symbol & marker list would be one thousandth the
size. You can see the deployment attractiveness of the latter.

> I guess you must already need to extract the symbols for your kprobes.
> Do you use kallsyms for this?

Nope. /proc/kallsyms is a another run-time-only source of data, and
so is not applicable for off-line (ahead-of-time) mapping.

> I would rather prefer not to implement superfluous built-time data
> extraction in the kernel build system just to make userspace
> simpler. [...]

It is not superfluous, as it would solve a real distribution problem.


- FChE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-26 16:33    [W:0.125 / U:0.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site