Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:01:52 +0530 | From | Balbir Singh <> | Subject | Re: [x86 patch] Fix UML signal.h build errors |
| |
Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 06:30:22PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: >> Fix build errors seen in UML. > > Al fixed these already. > > FWIW, below is a rolled-up combo patch which make 2.6.24-rc1 UML build. > > It includes Al's build fixes, Wang Cong's driver fix, and a declaration > mismatch in sched.c. > > Jeff >
Thats nice, I wonder why I missed them searching on lkml in my gmail box :(
Is __arch_um__ the right thing to do or BITS_PER_LONG == 32? I prefer BITS_PER_LONG == 32 over #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__arch__um__). I guess its a matter of personal preference.
-- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |