Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:00:39 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML |
| |
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:52:08 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:55:44 +0400 > Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> wrote: > > > I look at the 2.6.23-mm1 and see that there's one hunk lost. This > > is the one Oleg re-sent some days ago (the mail thread subject was > > 2.6.23-mm1 thread exit_group issue). Here it is (sent 13 oct 2007): > > > > --- kernel/fork.c~ 2007-10-13 15:41:35.000000000 +0400 > > +++ kernel/fork.c 2007-10-13 15:41:41.000000000 +0400 > > @@ -1443,6 +1443,9 @@ long do_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, > > task_pid_nr_ns(p, current->nsproxy->pid_ns) : > > task_pid_vnr(p); > > > > + if (clone_flags & CLONE_PARENT_SETTID) > > + put_user(nr, parent_tidptr); > > + > > if (clone_flags & CLONE_VFORK) { > > p->vfork_done = &vfork; > > init_completion(&vfork); > > > > Please, try with this patch. > > The patch above fixes the issue for me. > > Autofs works again as expected.
argh. Sorry guys, I'd completely forgotten that that bug was present in -mm1 and I didn't upload the fix into hot-fixes/. Bad me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |