Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:53:55 -0700 (PDT) | From | david@lang ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v5 |
| |
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Huang, Ying wrote: >> >> >> The restore process with the patch set is as follow: >> >> 1. Boot a kernel C (crash dump enabled), the memory area used by >> kernel C must be a subset of memory area used by kernel B. > > Why is a third kernel needed? Why can't kernel B be used for this as well? > In fact, if kernel A has been compiled to be relocatable and crash dump > enabled, why wouldn't it suffice for all 3 instances?
you could use one kernel for all three, or you could use three different kernels, and three different sets of userspace if it's appropriate.
David Lang - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |