lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> If we can't just cancel the work, can't we do something like
>
> if (cancel_work_sync(w))
> w->func(w);
>
> instead?

We do an equivalent of this -- all that we care about that w->func(w)
would do is enable_irq() and the rest we want to skip at this point. We
probably do not need the counter in the end though.

Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-18 18:01    [W:0.728 / U:0.972 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site