Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:26:01 -0800 | From | Martin Bligh <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.20-rc6-mm1 |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530 > Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 >>> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote: >>> >>>>> - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I had to >>>>> apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 compilation >>>>> errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to >>>>> runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added. >>>> dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ? >>> OK, I'll dump git-block.patch. That means that the fsaio patches get >>> temporarily dropped as well as they depend on git-block changes somewhat. >> Would you like me to rework these back again to not depend on git-block ? > > Is OK thanks, I now have a git-block minus CFQ changes, so I have restored the fsaio > patches.
On a happy note - mm2 seems to pass testing much better ;-)
M.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |