lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0
Date
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:

Hi!

> The /proc/bus/input/devices has an extensible structure. You can just
> add an "A:" line (for Activity) instead of adding a new proc file.
>
> I know, but IMO there is too much stuff to parse in there. Activity counters
> are frequently accessed by daemons, and four or five concurrent daemons are the
> norm in a typical X11 linux box...

Syscalls are fast enough, and the file is _very_ easy (=> fast) to parse.

> Also, the activity counters should IMO coincide with the event times
> passed through /dev/input/event, and should not be jiffies based.
> Ideally, both should be based on clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC).
>
> In evdev.c do_gettimeofday() is used. Anyway I just need of a monotonic
> counter, so get_jiffies_64() wouldn't be better? It isn't affected by wrapping
> issues and it is probably faster than do_gtod().

Just use same time source rest of inputs already do...

OK, but what about the time-warp problem?. To fix it I need to know when the
system goes to sleep/resumes. In SIN I've solved via the platform driver,
introducing suspend() resume() callbacks...

greets,

--
Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they
do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand. - Putt's Law
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-29 23:45    [W:0.106 / U:0.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site