Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:00:42 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros. |
| |
Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > >>Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> >> >>>by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to >>>types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over >>>100 instances of those same macros being *defined* throughout the >>>source tree. you're not going to be deleting the hundreds and >>>hundreds of *uses* of TRUE and FALSE (not yet, anyway) but, at the >>>very least, by adding two lines to types.h, you can delete all >>>those redundant *definitions* and make sure that nothing breaks. >>>(it shouldn't, of course, but it's always nice to be sure.) >> >>Doesn't seem very worthwhile, and it legitimises this definition >>we're trying to get rid of. > > > hmmmmmmmm ... apparently, you totally missed my use of the important > word "temporarily":
No, I didn't.
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |