Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:38:06 -0500 (EST) | From | Stuart Anderson <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: cyber2010 framebuffer on ARM Netwinder fix... |
| |
Just wondering, did the rtc change for the arm get sent up also?
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> * Stuart Anderson <anderson@netsweng.com> [2007-01-05 09:40]: >> >>> shark w/o any changes to the kernel. I dug a bit further, both in the >>> driver, and in the HW spec for the shark, and discovered that the video >>> chip on the shark is connected via the VL bus, not the PCI bus. The >>> shark does have a VL-PCI bridge, but there doesn't seem to be anything >>> connected to the PCI side of it (which matches what lspci says). The >>> function containing the patch in question doesn't appear to even run on >>> the shark (there is a VL version that is #ifdef SHARK'd), so I'd have >>> to say the patch would have not impact on the shark. >>> >> >> OK, good news. Thanks for checking. Woody, can you submit the patch >> (with proper intentation) to linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> > > As suggested - I am sending this patch to fbdev-devel.... > > The Netwinder machines with Cyber2010 crash badly when starting Xserver. > The workaround is to disable pci burst option for this revision of video > chip. > > Thanks, Woody > >
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson anderson@netsweng.com Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/ 1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |