Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:27:44 -0500 | From | Phillip Susi <> | Subject | Re: O_DIRECT question |
| |
dean gaudet wrote: > it seems to me that if splice and fadvise and related things are > sufficient for userland to take care of things "properly" then O_DIRECT > could be changed into splice/fadvise calls either by a library or in the > kernel directly...
No, because the semantics are entirely different. An application using read/write with O_DIRECT expects read() to block until data is physically fetched from the device. fadvise() does not FORCE the kernel to discard cache, it only hints that it should, so a read() or mmap() very well may reuse a cached page instead of fetching from the disk again. The application also expects write() to block until the data is on the disk. In the case of a blocking write, you could splice/msync, but what about aio?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |