Messages in this thread | | | From | CIJOML <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3) | Date | Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:08:41 +0100 |
| |
I all,
I can't work on this until 23.2.2007 because of my diploma thesis. But my opinion is - if you make a release with this bug, you'll see more reporters soon. It can be than fixed in 2.6.20.1 - I haven't find any data corruptions yet.
Michal
Dne čtvrtek 11 leden 2007 11:54 Adrian Bunk napsal(a): > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:21:23AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > >Subject : BUG: at fs/inotify.c:172 set_dentry_child_flags() > > > > >References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7785 > > > > >Submitter : Cijoml Cijomlovic Cijomlov <cijoml@volny.cz> > > > > >Handled-By : John McCutchan <john@johnmccutchan.com> > > > > >Status : problem is being debugged > > > > > > > > I'm not sure that this is actually a regression for 2.6.20-rc. > > > > > > The submitter says it doesn't occur in 2.6.19. > > > > Any chance that the submitter could do git bisect? (added to CC). From > > the bugzilla entry it seems to be well reproducible for him. > > That's a possible but time intensive approach for this kind of bug. > > I'd expect bisecting such an "at least 1 times a day" bug to take at > about one month. > > And that's not a high number, that's a realistic estimate considering > that you have to test a dozen kernels and verifying that a kernel is > good takes 2-3 days. > > > Jiri Kosina > > cu > Adrian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |