Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:29:19 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.18-mm1 compile failure on x86_64 |
| |
Andy Whitcroft wrote: > Martin Bligh wrote: > >> http://test.kernel.org/abat/49037/debug/test.log.0 >> >> AS arch/x86_64/boot/bootsect.o >> LD arch/x86_64/boot/bootsect >> AS arch/x86_64/boot/setup.o >> LD arch/x86_64/boot/setup >> AS arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/head.o >> CC arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/misc.o >> OBJCOPY arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin >> BFD: Warning: Writing section `.data.percpu' to huge (ie negative) file >> offset 0x804700c0. >> /usr/local/autobench/sources/x86_64-cross/gcc-3.4.0-glibc-2.3.2/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-objcopy: >> arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin: File truncated >> make[2]: *** [arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin] Error 1 >> make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2 >> make: *** [bzImage] Error 2 >> 09/25/06-09:13:48 Build the kernel. Failed rc = 2 >> 09/25/06-09:13:49 build: kernel build Failed rc = 1 >> >> Wierd. Same box compiled 2.6.18 fine. >> > > Pretty sure this isn't a space problem, as we have just checked space > before the build and I've taken no action since then. Someone did > mention "tool chain issue" when it was first spotted. Will check with > them and see why they thought that. >
Does this box have an older version of binutils (2.15?)? If so, it might be getting upset over the patch "note-section" in Andi's queue. I know it has been a bit problematic, but I don't know if the problems manifest in this way.
J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |