Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:04:57 -0700 | From | "Ray Lee" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans (NTP changes) |
| |
On 9/25/06, john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I was able to run tests for two days each w/ and w/o the patch I had > concerns about. And indeed, it seems if the drift file is reset, the > initial convergence is much slower (and this is really what worried me). > However once it converges it seems to keep sync as well as the current > code.
So slower convergence isn't a regression?
Ray - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |