lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!)
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> #define MARK_SYM(name) \
> do { \
> __label__ here; \
> volatile static void *__mark_kprobe_##name \
> asm (MARK_CALL_PREFIX#name) \
> __attribute__((unused)) = &&here; \
> here: \
> do { } while(0); \
> } while(0)
>
> Which fixes the problem. Some tests showed me that the compiler does not unroll
> an otherwise unrolled loop when this specific macro is called. (test done with
> -funroll-all-loops).

Eh? I thought you wanted to avoid changing the generated code?
Inhibiting loop unrolling could be a pretty large change...

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-22 04:11    [W:0.040 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site