Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:06:49 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!) |
| |
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > #define MARK_SYM(name) \ > do { \ > __label__ here; \ > volatile static void *__mark_kprobe_##name \ > asm (MARK_CALL_PREFIX#name) \ > __attribute__((unused)) = &&here; \ > here: \ > do { } while(0); \ > } while(0) > > Which fixes the problem. Some tests showed me that the compiler does not unroll > an otherwise unrolled loop when this specific macro is called. (test done with > -funroll-all-loops).
Eh? I thought you wanted to avoid changing the generated code? Inhibiting loop unrolling could be a pretty large change...
J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |