Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:06:56 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management) |
| |
* Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org> wrote:
> +config MARK_SYMBOL > +config MARK_JUMP_CALL > +config MARK_JUMP_INLINE > +config MARK_JUMP
same NACK over the proliferation of options as before:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115881457219562&w=2
Tap, tap, is this thing on? ;)
found one related reply from you that i didnt answer yet:
"As an example, LTTng traces the page fault handler, when kprobes just can't instrument it."
but tracing a raw pagefault at the arch level is a bad idea anyway, we want to trace __handle_mm_fault(). That way you can avoid having to modify every architecture's pagefault handler ...
but the other points remained unanswered as far as i can see.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |