Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch02/05]: Containers(V2)- Generic Linux kernel changes | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | 20 Sep 2006 13:27:33 +0200 |
| |
Rohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com> writes: > */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_CONTAINERS > + struct container_struct *ctn; /* Pointer to container, may be NULL */ > +#endif
I still don't think it's a good idea to add a pointer to struct page for this. This means any kernel that enables the config would need to carry this significant overhead, no matter if containers are used to not.
Better would be to store them in some other data structure that is only allocated on demand or figure out a way to store them in the sometimes not all used fields in struct page.
BTW your patchkit seems to be also in wrong order in that when 02 is applied it won't compile.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |