Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:33:25 -0700 | From | "Paul Menage" <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction |
| |
On 9/20/06, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote: > > Yes, I read that in your patches, I was wondering how the cpuset > approach would handle this.
The VM currently has support for letting vmas define their own memory policies - so specifying that a file-backed vma gets its memory from a particular set of memory nodes would accomplish that for the fake-node approach. The mechanism for setting up the per-file/per-vma policies would probably involve something originating in struct inode or struct address_space.
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |