Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:47:53 +0200 | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Subject | Re: [patch] do_no_pfn() |
| |
Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On 20 Sep 2006 03:25:25 -0400 Jes Sorensen wrote: >> +#define NOPFN_SIGBUS ((unsigned long) -1) >> +#define NOPFN_OOM ((unsigned long) -2) > > Is there any difference in the above and > > #define NOPFN_SIGBUS -1UL > #define NOPFN_OOM -2UL
I don't think there is, but I was trying to keep it consistent with the NOPAGE_foo versions - the way it's done is more explicit so less likely anyone will get confused over it.
I can change it if it's a sticking point, but I'd claim thats more noise than it's worth.
Thanks, Jes
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |