Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 23:12:06 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'm also looking at it this way too: you already seem to be quite > reluctant to add kprobes to your architecture today. How reluctant would > you be tomorrow if you had static tracepoints, which would remove a fair > chunk of incentive to implement kprobes?
If I see that whole teams spend years to implement efficient dynamic tracing, do you really think that your "incentive" makes any difference?
byem Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |