Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 20:19:07 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> What Karim is sharing with us here (yet again) is the real in-field > experience of real users (ie: not kernel developers).
well, Jes has that experience and Thomas too.
> I mean, on one hand we have people explaining what they think a > tracing facility should and shouldn't do, and on the other hand we > have a guy who has been maintaining and shipping exactly that thing to > (paying!) customers for many years.
so does Thomas and Jes. So what's the point?
i judge LTT by its current code quality, not by its proponents shouting volume - and that quality is still quite poor at the moment. (and then there are the conceptual problems too, outlined numerous times) I have quoted specific example(s) for that in this thread. Furthermore, LTT does this:
246 files changed, 26207 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
and this gives me the shivers, for all the reasons i outlined.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |