Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:35:22 -0400 | From | Karim Yaghmour <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
Alan Cox wrote: > In the meantime perhaps the saner members of the static trace brigade > can explain why gcc debug data isn't good enough for them when its good > enough for kgdb to do single stepping at source level and variable > printing ?
Care to explain how I can use to implement the equivalent of this:
@@ -1709,6 +1712,7 @@ switch_tasks: ++*switch_count;
prepare_arch_switch(rq, next); + TRACE_SCHEDCHANGE(prev, next); prev = context_switch(rq, prev, next); barrier();
Also, care to explain how kprobes can be used to access same data without having to actually customize a probe point for every binary?
Thanks,
Karim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |