Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:17:29 -0400 | From | Karim Yaghmour <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
Paul Mundt wrote: > subjective, LTT proved that this was a problem regarding general > code-level intrusiveness when the number of tracepoints in relatively > close locality started piling up based on what people considered > arbitrarily useful, and LTTng doesn't appear to do anything to address > this.
"LTT proved that ..." what are you talking about? Have you noticed the posting earlier regarding the fact that the ltt tracepoints did not change over a 5 year span? **five** years ... Where do you get this claim that ltt trace points "started piling up"? Have a look at figure 2 of this article and let me know exactly which of those tracepoints are actually a problem to you: http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix2000/general/full_papers/yaghmour/yaghmour_html/index.html
Karim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |