Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:08:21 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jiri Kosina <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Synaptics - fix lockdep warnings |
| |
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Yes, this is much, much better. Could you please tell me if depth should > be a true depth or just an unique number? The reason I am asking is that > I hope to get rid of parent/child pointers in serio (they were > introduced when driver core could not handle recursive addition/removing > of devices on the same bus).
I am afraid you can't generate just any unique number to represent the lock class, as the lockdep validator fails if the class number is higher than MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES, which is by default 8.
Regarding the patches - should I submit them upstream, or will you?
Thanks,
-- JiKos. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |