lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] Synaptics - fix lockdep warnings
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> Yes, this is much, much better. Could you please tell me if depth should
> be a true depth or just an unique number? The reason I am asking is that
> I hope to get rid of parent/child pointers in serio (they were
> introduced when driver core could not handle recursive addition/removing
> of devices on the same bus).

I am afraid you can't generate just any unique number to represent the
lock class, as the lockdep validator fails if the class number is higher
than MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES, which is by default 8.

Regarding the patches - should I submit them upstream, or will you?

Thanks,

--
JiKos.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-14 17:11    [W:0.057 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site