Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:31:52 +0000 | From | Frederik Deweerdt <> | Subject | Re: [-mm patch] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c |
| |
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:07:35PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > > > Yes it does, but the intended use of 'func' (or so I understood) is to > > print the calling function name, not the current function's, isn't it? > > Dunno, I took it to mean the current function from the context of that > patch. I could be wrong, of course. I've just checked, this are some of the callers of vfp_single_normaliseround (last argument is 'func'):
in vfp_single_fuito: vfp_single_normaliseround(sd, &vs, fpscr, 0, "fuito"); in vfp_single_fsito: vfp_single_normaliseround(sd, &vs, fpscr, 0, "fsito"); in vfp_single_fnmul: vfp_single_normaliseround(sd, &vsd, fpscr, exceptions, "fnmul");
It definitely looks like we want the calling function to be printed here.
Regards, Frederik
> > - z > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |