Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:14:10 +0530 | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory) |
| |
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:10:31PM -0700, Rohit Seth wrote: > It seems that a single notion of limit should suffice, and that limit > should more be treated as something beyond which that resource > consumption in the container will be throttled/not_allowed.
The big question is : are containers/RG allowed to use *upto* their limit always? In other words, will you typically setup limits such that sum of all limits = max resource capacity?
If it is setup like that, then what you are considering as limit is actually guar no?
If it wont be setup like that, then I dont see how one can provide QoS.
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |