Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Sep 2006 12:08:14 -0400 | From | "Chuck Lever" <> | Subject | Re: [NFS] [PATCH 019 of 19] knfsd: Register all RPC programs with portmapper by default |
| |
On 9/1/06, Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:31:25AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > > I don't like this. The idea that multiple RPC services are listening > > on the same port is a total hack. What other service might use this > > besides NFSACL? > > Why do you consider this a hack? I have always felt that librpc requiring > you to open separate ports for every program you register was a poor > design. The RPC header contains the program number, and the RPC code > is fully capable of demuxing incoming requests. So I do not think it is > a hack at all. > > And yes, Solaris NFSACL resides on 2049 too.
I meant "Does Solaris advertise NFSACL on 2049 via the portmapper?"
-- "We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals" -- Quarry worker's creed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |