Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13] | Date | Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:08:34 +0100 |
| |
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Your CONFIG_BLOCK patches did a decent job of trashing your > fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, btw. What's up with that? OK, it's sensible > for people to work against mainline but the net effect of doing that is to > create a mess for other people to clean up.
It seems the only problem in my patches is that the file address space operations have had the sync_pages op removed in a patch in the disable-block-layer patchset as it's no longer necessary.
However, as I suspect you're applying the block patches *before* the FS-Cache patches, I can't give you an incremental patch that you can apply after the other fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, since you need to modify the first patch (fs-cache-make-kafs-use-fs-cache.patch) to get it to apply at all now.
So, I could issue a revised AFS+FS-Cache patch, would that do? Or would you rather have a patch that you can apply to the one you already have directly and modify it in place?
David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |