lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: modifying degraded raid 1 then re-adding other members is bad
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Why we're updating it BACKWARD in the first place?
>
Don't know this one...
> Also, why, when we adding something to the array, the event counter is
> checked -- should it resync regardless?
If you remove a drive and then add it back with
no changes in the meantime, then you don't want
a resync to happen. Some people reboot their machine
every day (too much noise, heat or electricity at night),
a daily resync is excessive.

An which drive would you consider
the "master copy" anyway, if the event counts match?

Helge Hafting

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-09 11:07    [W:1.148 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site