Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:53:31 +0200 (MEST) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion |
| |
>> Yes, it looks like a business of node plugin, but AFAIK, you >> objected against such checks: > >Did I really? Well, I think that allowing users to choose whether to >checksum or not is a reasonable thing to allow them. I personally would >skip the checksum on my computer, but others.... > >It could be a useful mkfs option....
It should preferably a runtime tunable variable, at best even per-superblock and (overriding the sb setting), per-file.
Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |